Archive for September, 2008

thesis ideas

Knowledge is an obsession.

Ex: devouring books

Ex: paradise lost tree of knowledge led to downfall of man

 

Creator-creation, bitterness, evil, envy

Thesis: Creation brings bitterness, evil, and envy amongst the creator and the creation.

Ex: adam is resentful of god—starts to look towards satan’s side.

Ex: the creature is resentful towards Victor and envious of all mankind and acts maliciously for Victor’s attention

Ex: Victor is bitter  because of how his creature turned out. (it wasn’t an eloquent human, but a monster)

Passage from 117

( Hateful day when I received life!….Accursed creator! Why did you form a monster so hideous that even you turned from me in disgust? God, in pity, made man beautiful and alluring, after his own image; but my form is a filthy type of yours, more horrid even from the very resemblance.)

(I considered Satan as the fitter emblem of my condition; for often, like him, when I viewed the bliss of my protectors, the bitter gall of envy rose within me.)

(Satan had his companions, fellow-devils, to admire and encourage him; but I am solitary and abhorred.”)

 

First he compares himself to adam, the he is too horrid so he compares himself to satan. The monster feels so horrid and monstrous he can’t even compare himself to Satan. Then he says that even satan has companions so what does that make him? Even more wretched and evil. This could guide his behavior to do malicious evil things.

 

 

                Is a passion for knowledge a consuming obsession?

Knowledge can bring about glorious creations and benefit the world, but it can also become a harmful addiction that consumes a person. Victor thrived in a scientific and intellectual environment. He was an introvert and the obsession with knowledge caused him to become physically sick and mentally ill. (insert passage about his work ethic and working days and nights without food or sleep until his project was complete)

Glog on Frankenstein up to chapter 21

Frankenstein glog:

Short Summary: Frankenstein has started to come out of his depression with the help of his friend Clerval, until he sees the monster during a storm. His family has been killed, young William, and one of Frankenstein’s childhood friends has been charged guilty. This woman was hanged and once again Frankenstein feels tremendous guilt because he knows that his creation is behind the tragedy. Frankenstein goes off on his own, to explore the mountainous range when the creature finds him and tells Frankenstein the story of his life, so far. The monster describes his life, living in the countryside. He soon watches a French family, the De Laceys, with admiration and adoration. The monster desires the family’s love and attention, but he fears their reaction to his stitched, mutilated appearance. He learns French by observing them and sympathizes with their suffering. The creature experiences emotions such as pity, sorrow, and love, for he loved the family and watched them daily. He even made life for them easier, by chopping wood for them and clearing the snow in the winter. Later the monster reveals his face to the blind father hoping to show his personality and be accepted, but the family comes in and sees the dreadful creature and begin to beat him until the monster fled the home. This horrible event made the creature despise mankind, especially his creator, because he could not live alone in a world where none accepted him. The monster tells Frankenstein this story and pleads with the scientist to make him a female companion. Frankenstein fears for his life and the life of his relatives and close ones. Frankenstein begins to make the female creature, spending hours in a lab, loathing the entire process. Meanwhile Elizabeth and Frankenstein are to be engaged when Frankenstein is finished with his studies and travels, finished with the creation of the female monster. Frankenstein soon has thoughts of the terrible havoc that could come about if the female monster and the original creature spawn children, or if the female rejects the male. The threat of a new creature and even a new race was too much for Frankenstein and in the middle of creating the female he kills her, and stops his work. The monster sees this and swears to inflict unimaginable pain onto Frankenstein, as he swims from the island where Frankenstein has worked in seclusion. Frankenstein rows away from the island and arrives in Ireland, where he is charged with a horrendous crime.

Observations: Shelley uses many repetitive images and motifs throughout the novel. Some I picked up on in these chapters were:

•    Horror
•    Murder/crime
•    Ice/Cold/Snow
•    Wet/Damp/Rain
•    Wretch
•    Heaven/Divine
•    Eyes
•    Create/Creation/Creator
•    Fiend
•    Rage/Anger/Revenge/Fire
•    Devil/Demon/Evil/Hell
•    Misery/Gloom/Mournful/Melancholy
•    Heart
•    Mind
•    Soul/Spirits
•    Black/Dark/Night
•    White
•    Lake/River/Ocean
•    Wild/Madness
•    Moon

Some of these words I wonder their significance and if they are symbolic?

Eyes     -Eyes of God watching
-Eyes can also be a portal to ones soul/spirits
Wretch
-When I looked up the definition to wretch I found “a vile despicable person”       but I also found an older definition to be a stranger, or person in exile”. This word directly applies to both Frankenstein and his creation, for they have both been isolated from the world and live in misery.

Fire
One thing I noticed specifically about this world was there was a detailed description of when the monster found fire (97). The word fire is repeated about 7 times on one page. I paused and tried to think of the significance of the authors intense description. In this part of the story the creature has found a burning fire left by some travelers. It amazes him for he can cook his food, and it keeps him warm. He protects the fire until he can no longer find any more food in that area and he departs. The monster describes his loss of fire – “I exceedingly lamented the loss of the fire which I had obtained through accident”. That is a strong phrase. So why would the author put so much emphasis on one object, fire? Fire can stand for hell, warmth, passion, or light. I believe that the fire represents the creature. Like a fire, for a flame can go from soft warmth to wild and dangerous, the creature is unpredictable and can go through dangerous mood swings.

Scientific Subjects

Shelley seems to be saying that having a passion for a subject can easily turn into an unhealthy and dangerous obsession. I agree with her opinion. In society today, especially in the pharmaceutical industry, people are no longer thought of as people, but as subjects. For this reason doctors and scientists, experimenting on people and animals, must obey certain procedures and take ethics classes. Everyday I hear form my mother, who works in the pharmaceutical industry, that test subjects die due to the negligence of  scientists (one example I specifically remember is the death of a college student who volunteered to be a subject for an experiment). The scientists are so involved in their own agenda they stop caring about their subject. In a way this happened to the creature. Frankenstein was wrapped up in his world and did not think about the consequences of his actions. The creature suffers deeply, because his life was never accounted for. The creature was given life, but what kind of life does he have? He suffers in isolation. Frankenstein now feels horrible for what he has done, but it is too late. His feeling of regret is not even directed towards  the suffering of the creature, but the suffering of himself, and the loss of his loved ones. Losing ones loved ones is a great tragedy, but if Frankenstein would stop being so self-involved then maybe a solution could be found.

The Psychology Behind Reading-writingproject#1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Psychology Behind Reading

 

 

 

 

By: Caitlin Carter

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

English 101                                                Professor Meehan                                    9/11/2008

                                                                 MWF class

 

Autobiographical literature reveals deep insights into an author’s character. While reading The Gutenberg Elegies, I began to ponder whether one’s childhood experiences shape future behavior and attitudes. Birkerts, the author, expresses his deep emotional attachment towards reading in many of his excerpts. He is a troubled individual I theorize his conflicts evolved from experiences during adolescence. My childhood memories with my mother have indeed shaped my adoration for reading. Therefore, I strongly believe childhood experiences shape one’s attitude towards reading.

            Birkerts spent much of his youth reading for “pleasure” (35).  He read in “isolation” describing the reading as “a private resonance, a daydream,” and more descriptively “a moveable feast” (35). This deep attachment to reading evolved from his need for “a refuge” (35). The overbearing personality and “strictness” of Birkerts’s father created Birkerts’s complex attitude towards reading. Birkerts’s father’s opinion was that “doing [was] prized over thinking” and reading was considered a “feminine” act (38). Birkerts’s mother, on the other hand, praised reading. Like Birkerts’s “she read for pleasure, company, for escape,” and “there was never a time when she did not have one book going” (38). Birkerts’s attitude towards literature is now disjointed, due to the conflicting attitudes from both guardians.

            Birkerts passion for reading grew as he aged. Reading was a “dreamy sensuousness” and the pages he viewed were “tantalizing” (35). His urge to consume every book was a “direct outgrowth of a love of reading” (34). Birkerts uses strong emotional diction to convey his desire to read; this view of literature seems very straightforward. You may not think this man has a conflicted attitude towards reading. I disagree. As I read The Gutenberg Elegies I observed many oddities in Birkerts statements about literature. When Birkerts describes his occupation as “a book reviewer” he describes the job as “that thing [he] so confidently scorned” (33). This is a very strange statement for a literature lover to say; I hypothesize, though Birkerts loves literature, he feels embarrassed to have a literary occupation. Birkerts has an unconscious view that a career in literature is insufficient or even “feminine,” as Birkerts father would put (35).

            Birkerts’s troubles with the written word were not rarities. When Birkerts was a young adult he decided to move to Maine with his girlfriend; the plan was for them to live in isolation and become excellent writers. A good idea in theory, but the plan was flawed. Birkerts could not write. Though Birkerts had no trouble “finding joy” in solitude while reading; writing was very challenging (39). Birkerts wrote some “terse openings for what [he] hoped might, with some coaxing, become stories,” but the attempt was futile (54). As Birkerts puts “the soothing futurity at the core of the fantasy was gone” (54). So what happened? It is my belief that Birkerts’s disturbed view of literature affected the way he wrote. Birkerts loved literature but could not have his dream profession; his parents raised him to have conflicting views of literature. Literature cannot fully consume Birkerts’s life because his subconscious replays his father’s voice every time he begins to write; reading and writing are what one does when “all other options have been exhausted” (38).

            Like Birkerts, I believe that my personal attitude towards reading was shaped by my childhood experiences with my family. During my formative years, I spent the long summers reading with my mother. On warm days, my mother and I would sunbathe for hours while we consumed literature. We would lay a soft blanket over the crisp grass and lay out all day reading. The environment was soothing and pleasurable. The memories I have of reading are images of warm wonderful sunrays, velvety blankets, cool lemonade, and closeness to my mother. This detailed moment left me with an undeniable passion for reading. The gratifying experience left me with a strong association of literature with nurturing and comfort. An incident from my childhood shaped my attitude towards reading for the rest of my life. 

As I grew older my mother constantly pushed books into my view. She believed much the opposite of Birkerts’s father; her opinion was that books were a treasure trove to be discovered. Inside books is the knowledge one needs to grow, survive, and thrive. In today’s technological world literature is pushed to the background, while television, computers, and ipods are cherished. The reason I stuck to literature was the strong positive association I experienced while reading, and my mother forbade most electronic entertainment in the house. Thinking and reading was valued over observing a computer or television screen.

Another moment in my childhood that greatly shaped my attitude towards reading was in kindergarten. I still have the memory clear in my mind. It was any other day at my kindergarten center, Great Expectations; all the kids were sitting on the floor. In the classroom I had noticed very few books in the class, something I was not used to at home. I was sitting reading a Berenstein Bears book, when a classmate came over to tell me the lesson for the day was starting. Our lesson that day was supposed to be about reading; I was excited, considering there were few books in the classroom. We were learning the alphabet. I realized at that moment that I was much farther ahead in my reading abilities than many of the other students. I was proud of my aptitudes and I wanted to greater expand my knowledge that moment on. This was a very significant instant in time because I realized that I was the only one who enjoyed reading; most of the other children struggled to learn just the alphabet. I attributed my abilities to hours spent with my parents reading.

Your childhood molds your attitude toward reading. Birkerts’s passion for reading changed due to the contradictory attitudes of his guardians, while my fervor for reading derived from the time spent bonding with my mother. Parental influence can significantly change a person’s passion for a subject.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This work was completed in accordance of the honor code.

 

 

 

Self Evaluation: I believe in this essay my quotations, from The Gutenberg Elegies, were inserted correctly and used effectively. I also think the thesis of my essay was presented clearly and I had substantial evidence to convince the audience to agree with my point. Although, I think that my conclusion may have been weak because of the broad message inserted at the end. I am also a little unsure of two sentences I have inserted into my paper; the lines “We were learning the alphabet,” “Birkerts could not write,” and “I disagree,” were written deliberately to make these parts of my essay stand out, but I don’t know if this stylistic choice was effect.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bibliography

 

 

Birkerts, Sven. The Gutenberg Elegies. New York: Faber and Faber Inc., 1994

 

Essay Outline

Thesis: Childhood personal experiences shape one’s attitude towards reading.

outline:

Intro: include thesis talk about maybe personal feelings–what reading means to you—foreshadow birkerts childhood and how it relates to his feelings and finally an outside source(roomate or friend) and their feelings towards reading.

section 1:

my personal experience

—description of day in the summer (include personal feelings be very descriptive and elaborate; talk about the bonding with mom to lead into family influence)

—talk about family influence (mothers joy, grandmothers joy, sisters joy)

—connect to reading now and the enjoyment from reading (whether its school assigned ex wuthering heights and jane eyre) or reading on my own (twilight series, harry potter series

section 2: Birkerts

–talk about Birkerts childhood (conflicting views from his parents and his deep emotional attachment towards reading)

–talk about how that effected his views towards reading today (very conflicted, insecure with self (job position and other insecurities that led him towards failure in his life)

—-bring in evidence about move to maine with gf

—-talk about conflicts (social vs isolation)

—-maybe mention his influence on his daughter and how that may have shaped her view of reading (he hate beauty in the beast but allows her to watch it) -also beauty in the beast has multiple authors but he loves reading because essentially you are the author too because you are imagining the details of the story

section 3:

must interview someone

qs to ask: childhood experiences towards reading?

——-family influence on reading?

——-reading opinions today?

——-personal opinions towards my thesis (possibly add if they correspond to message of this essay)

Conclusion:

Notes

Thesis: Childhood personal experiences shape one’s attitude towards reading.

-connect to Birkerts childhood (father and mother had opposing viewpoints so he grew up with conflicted attitudes towards reading)

—–he doesn’t like social reading but he talks about what he read to other people(conflicting)

—–he greatly enjoys reading and writing but he feels embarassed to be an editor

—–he has identity problems because his father discouraged his love for reading while his mother encouraged it; this is why he doesn’t know what he wants to do with his life and why he raises his daughter with conflicting views (he hates disney but he allows her to love it

Family-my personal experiences

-talk about how my grandmother loved to read and passed that love to my mother which then translated into my love of readin

——-nature vs nurture (possible topic to talk about)

-don’t forget to interview one other person on their opinion of reading!!!!!!

Birkerts Ch 2 continued

Birkerts seemed to have somewhat of an identity problem. At first I thought that he wanted to live like his characters, a life full of adventure, and he did this by reading their stories. Now I believe that Birkerts might have no sense of personal identity. I quote “I wanted to be those characters, to have their lives,” I think this quote shows Birkerts deep desire to be one of the characters he read about (pg 44). He wanted to create himself in a sense, “those years of urgent self-making was tied up with fantasy” (pg 45). I think this fact is what made Birkerts miserable for most of his life. He was trying to be something that he wasn’t. When he finally moved to Maine with his girlfriend, it was the perfect life and the perfect place for peaceful writing, but he couldn’t write. I think the reason this is was because he really didn’t want to be a writer during that time. He wanted to be a character, and live that sort of life. When he was most happy was when he was reading, and divulging into others lives. He refused to accept himself, and this led to his misery. Then his desires change. He no longer wants to be a character, but a writer; when I say writer he doesn’t want that occupation, he wants that writer’s life. A repeated word in this book is “fantasy” and that was what composed Birkerts life wholly and entirely. Then Birkerts goes through a terrible breakup and again books come to his rescue and save him. He began to read compulsively again and he “told [himself] that [he] was happy,” the wording of this quote suggests that Birkerts wasn’t actually happy. My observation of this man has led me to the conclusion that he is deeply conflicted, he wants to live an impossible fantasy life and not accept who he is as a person.

Isolation:

“Everything I had repressed after my breakup with S. came flooding forth. I wrote and wrote, and stuffed the poems away where no one would see them.” (pg 62)

Reading was a distraction and writing was a way for Birkerts to express his feelings. This writing was private, so I guess Birkerts learned as a child to keep his feelings private (probably the masculinity of his father told him that he wasn’t supposed to express emotions—like crying—publicly). But maybe only certain aspects of writing he believes should be kept private, because he discusses readings with his friend George. I’m unsure of what Birkerts thinks should be private and what should be publicly discussed…

Intro through Ch4

Few key points:

-Nature vs. Technology

-Religion vs. Technology/Science

These issues are still prevalent today (abortion, stem cell research)

As I was reading I began to notice repetitive words and I tried to unravel the meaning and significance of their mention. A lot of ideas in these first few chapters relate to science and life, but words that are repeated are divine images. Also in the introduction Shelley mentions her inspiration for Frankenstein came from Darwin’s experiments. Darwin was a man of controversy in his time, coming up with theories of natural selection and evolution, and therefore questioning many religions’ belief systems. I think Shelley brought some of that controversy into her work by constantly repeating science and religious imagery. I’m not sure if Shelley is going to make a statement about religion or science. From what I can gather, a man (the creator of the monster), reached suffering from his search for knowledge.  I’m assuming that Shelley is making a statement about science and that certain limits should not be crossed, such as creating life. I wonder if Shelley was a religious woman in her time…though her publishing of Frankenstein was certainly controversial. It’s hard to hypothesize Shelley’s message at this point, but so far I think she is rejecting some of sciences’ aspirations.

Notes:

Motifs/repeated words:

·         Animation/animated

·         Nature

·         Divine/God/Halo/Guardian

·         Spirit/Soul

·         Creator/Creation/Creature

·         Evil/Demon/Dark

·         Ice/Cold

·         Fog/Mist

·         Eyes (eyes are passage to soul-symbolism? Significance?)

·         Melancholy/Despair/Depression/Misery

·         Violence

·         Noble

·         Wild/Madness

·         Sea/Ocean

-Some repeated words relate to the themes of Religion vs. Technology/Science and Nature vs. Technology

-Speaker became immensely fascinated with books on the sciences

-Importance of books, to be well educated…this book also brings up the idea that knowledge can bring suffering and misery (Is ignorance bliss?)

-Some mention of cycles, such as seasons, death to life and life to death

Personal Experiences with Reading

I actually particularly enjoy reading. I was trying to understand where this love came from. I think the starting point was during my childhood; I wasn’t really allowed to watch a lot of tv, so my source of entertainment was reading. In the summer time my mother only allowed us to be inside a certain amount of time. Kids need fresh air. Well when my brothers ran around with the pets, or played with their toys I read outside with my mother. I’m not sure if it was because I wanted to be like my mother originally or if I just enjoyed reading with her. We would lay a blanket outside in the grass. My memories of reading outside are images of warm wonderful sunrays, soft blankets, cool lemonade, and closeness to my mother. These positive associations are not always experienced when reading, now I begin to react emotionally to the stories I read and I begin to deeply connect with the characters. Now my attraction to books is the fact that books can transport me to another place, time, world.